Regimes of Inequality

Product Description

Since the 1990s, mainstream political parties have failed to address the problem of growing inequality, resulting in political backlash and the transformation of European party systems. Most attempts to explain the rise of inequality in political science take a far too narrow approach, considering only economic inequality and failing to recognize how multiple manifestations of inequality combine to reinforce each other and the underlying political features of advanced welfare states. Combining training in public health with a background in political science, Julia Lynch brings a unique perspective to debates about inequality in political science and to public health thinking about the causes of and remedies for health inequalities. Based on case studies of efforts to reduce health inequalities in England, France and Finland, Lynch argues that inequality persists because political leaders chose to frame the issue of inequality in ways that made it harder to solve.

Review

‘This book provides a much-needed critical assessment of widespread, but largely unsuccessful, efforts to tackle health inequalities. It should cause those involved in developing policy responses to health inequalities, as well as those trying to influence these responses, to reflect on what they are proposing and why. As Lynch concludes, the policy levers for tackling inequality are clear; the question is whether policymakers are bold enough to use them.’ Katherine Smith, University of Strathclyde

‘An insightful and novel analysis of the evolution of health inequalities policies in Europe from the leading political scientist in the field. An important read for the global public health community.’ Clare Bambra, Newcastle University

‘This book is a milestone in research on why public policy has failed to reduce health inequalities. Many researchers now lay claim to political economy perspectives on this topic; Professor Lynch is one of the few who live up to the claim. Using analytical tools of political science that are often neglected by academic followers of fashion, she examines multiple case studies based on a sophisticated understanding of the evidence base that connects health inequalities with their economic substrates. A must-read for all scholars, practitioners and advocates concerned with this topic.’ Ted Schrecker, Newcastle University

‘Lynch’s book brings political science to a field of public health advocacy and policy that desperately needs it, showing the health inequalities world their existential challenge while bringing a central concern of the last three years of social policy into debates about inequality and politics that somehow missed it. Nobody will fail to learn from this book. Nobody will escape being challenged by it. And if there is such a person, they can still learn about how to write clearly across countries, disciplines, and ideas. Inequality is a focus of political scientists and economists today, but politically engaged health researchers got there thirty years ago. Lynch’s book chronicles the effort to make health inequalities a lever to change politics. Their failures, and occasional successes, should shape our thinking about how to put inequalities onto political agendas.’ Scott Greer, University of Michigan

‘Julia Lynch has written an extremely clever and timely book … Building on a formidable scholarly profile, she provides an original and often brilliant account of how health and wealth are not only closely related in modern democracies, but constitute distinct regimes and patterns of inequality across these states … Regimes of Inequality is a superbly written and cogently argued book which will rapidly become required reading for scholars of comparative politics.’ Desmond King, University of Oxford

‘In this eloquent and meticulously researched book, Julia Lynch shows that health outcomes in advanced countries are inextricably linked to broader patterns of social and economic inequity. Equal